PATHWAYS TO EQUITY IN INCLUSIVE EDUCATION: FLEXIBILIZATION, ADAPTATION OR TECHNOLOGIES?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.048-007Keywords:
Inclusive Education, Equity, Curricular Flexibilization, Pedagogical Adaptation, Educational TechnologiesAbstract
Promoting equity in inclusive education is one of the greatest challenges of contemporary schooling, especially in the face of persistent homogenizing pedagogical practices that hinder the full participation of students with different characteristics, rhythms, and ways of learning. In this context, terms such as curricular flexibilization, pedagogical adaptation, and educational technologies have gained centrality in educational discourse and school practices. However, although these concepts are often mobilized as responses to diversity, they are not always understood in their theoretical and operational specificities, which may generate misunderstandings, oversimplifications, and, in some cases, new forms of exclusion. This chapter aims to critically analyze these three pathways, discussing their foundations, differences, and possibilities in addressing educational inequalities. It is a theoretical essay grounded in authors from inclusive education, educational technologies, and public policy studies, especially Mantoan, Mendes, Glat, Pletsch, Booth, Ainscow, Holmes, Tuomi, and UNESCO documents. The analysis is based on the understanding that equity is not synonymous with equality, since it requires recognizing differences among learners without turning them into justification for curricular lowering. It is argued that curricular flexibilization supports the diversification of teaching and learning processes; pedagogical adaptation may be necessary in specific cases, provided that it does not compromise the right to knowledge; and educational technologies, including those based on artificial intelligence, expand possibilities for accessibility, personalization, and participation, but require critical, ethical, and pedagogically guided use. The chapter concludes that equity in inclusive schooling does not result from the isolated adoption of a single resource or strategy, but from a broader reorganization of school culture, curriculum, and teaching practices aimed at building more just, responsive, and democratically committed learning environments for all.
Downloads
References
AINSCOW, Mel. Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 7-16, 2020.
BOOTH, Tony; AINSCOW, Mel. Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. 3. ed. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education, 2011.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Política Nacional de Educação Especial na Perspectiva da Educação Inclusiva. Brasília, DF: MEC, 2008.
BRASIL. Lei n. 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015. Institui a Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência. Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, Brasília, DF, 7 jul. 2015.
CAST. Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Wakefield: CAST, 2018.
DUBET, François. O que é uma escola justa? A escola das oportunidades. Cadernos de Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 34, n. 123, p. 539-555, 2004.
GLAT, Rosana; BLANCO, Leila de Macedo Varela. Educação especial no contexto de uma educação inclusiva. In: GLAT, Rosana (org.). Educação inclusiva: cultura e cotidiano escolar. Rio de Janeiro: 7Letras, 2007. p. 15-35.
GLAT, Rosana; PLETSCH, Márcia Denise. Inclusão escolar de alunos com necessidades educacionais especiais. Rio de Janeiro: EdUERJ, 2011.
HOLMES, Wayne; TUOMI, Ilkka. State of the art and practice in AI in education. Brussels: European Commission, 2022.
KENSKI, Vani Moreira. Educação e tecnologias: o novo ritmo da informação. 8. ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2012.
MANTOAN, Maria Teresa Eglér. Inclusão escolar: o que é? por quê? como fazer? São Paulo: Moderna, 2003.
MANTOAN, Maria Teresa Eglér. Igualdade e diferenças na escola: como andar no fio da navalha. Educação, Porto Alegre, v. 29, n. 1, p. 55-64, 2006.
MENDES, Enicéia Gonçalves. A radicalização do debate sobre inclusão escolar no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 11, n. 33, p. 387-405, 2006.
MORAN, José. Metodologias ativas para uma aprendizagem mais profunda. In: BACICH, Lilian; MORAN, José (org.). Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2018. p. 35-76.
NÓVOA, António. Escolas e professores: proteger, transformar, valorizar. Salvador: SEC/IAT, 2022.
PLETSCH, Márcia Denise. Repensando a inclusão escolar: diretrizes políticas, práticas curriculares e deficiência intelectual. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: NAU, 2014.
PLETSCH, Márcia Denise; SOUZA, Flávia Faissal de. Formação de professores e práticas pedagógicas inclusivas: desafios contemporâneos. Revista Educação Especial, Santa Maria, v. 34, e1, p. 1-22, 2021.
UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO, 2021.
UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.