ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN BRAZILIAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: CARE INNOVATION, ETHICAL GOVERNANCE AND EQUITY IN THE SUS

Authors

  • Vinicius de Lima Lovadini Autor
  • Ana Carolina Buchegger Marcelino Moura Autor
  • Isabelly Almeida Costa Autor
  • André Wilian Lozano Autor
  • Valéria Albuquerque Vaz Rodrigues Autor
  • Ana Paula de Lima Autor
  • Wagner Rafael da Silva Autor
  • Vanessa Dias de Oliveira Justi Autor
  • Alessandra Cristiane Alves do Nascimento Autor
  • Patrícia Michelassi Carrinho Aureliano Autor
  • José Martins Pinto Neto Autor
  • Nicezia Vilela Junqueira Franqueiro Autor
  • Bianca Ortunho Boato Autor
  • Valter Mariano dos Santos Junior Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.061-014

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Primary Health Care, Unified Health System, Ethics, Equity

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the potential benefits, ethical risks and governance requirements associated with the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into Brazilian Primary Health Care (PHC). It is a theoretical-reflective narrative study based on scientific literature and normative documents addressing machine learning, clinical decision support, digital health, data protection, algorithmic bias and equity. The findings indicate that AI may support risk stratification, population health management, surveillance, natural language processing, telehealth and reduction of administrative workload. Nevertheless, these applications may reproduce historical inequalities, generate opaque decisions, expose sensitive data, increase technological dependence and exclude populations with limited digital access. High average performance does not guarantee distributive justice; therefore, results must be assessed across race/skin color, sex, age, disability, territory and socioeconomic status. Responsible incorporation into the Brazilian Unified Health System should be driven by concrete public health needs and include local validation, meaningful human oversight, transparency, continuous monitoring, social participation and accountability mechanisms. Technology should strengthen person-centered care and the principles of universality, comprehensiveness and equity without replacing professional judgment, therapeutic relationships or in-person alternatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1988.

BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais. Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, DF, 15 ago. 2018.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Estratégia de Saúde Digital para o Brasil 2020-2028. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2020.

OBERMEYER, Z.; POWERS, B.; VOGELI, C.; MULLAINATHAN, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, Washington, DC, v. 366, n. 6464, p. 447-453, 2019. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax2342.

ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DA SAÚDE. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: WHO, 2021.

RAJKOMAR, A.; DEAN, J.; KOHANE, I. Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, Boston, v. 380, n. 14, p. 1347-1358, 2019. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259.

TOPOL, E. J. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, New York, v. 25, p. 44-56, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.

UNESCO. Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO, 2022.

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Lovadini, V. de L., Moura, A. C. B. M., Costa, I. A., Lozano, A. W., Rodrigues, V. A. V., de Lima, A. P., da Silva, W. R., Justi, V. D. de O., do Nascimento, A. C. A., Aureliano, P. M. C., Pinto Neto, J. M., Franqueiro, N. V. J., Boato, B. O., & dos Santos Junior, V. M. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN BRAZILIAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: CARE INNOVATION, ETHICAL GOVERNANCE AND EQUITY IN THE SUS. Aurum Editora, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.061-014

Publications by the same author