MULTIPROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE IN SEPSIS PROTOCOLS IN EMERGENCY SETTINGS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MORTALITY REDUCTION AND CARE QUALIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.044-024Palabras clave:
Sepsis, Emergency, Multiprofessional team, Patient safety, Hospital mortalityResumen
Sepsis is one of the leading causes of hospital mortality worldwide, especially in emergency departments, urgent care services and intensive care units. Early recognition and rapid implementation of evidence-based care protocols are decisive factors for reducing mortality and improving the quality of care provided to critically ill patients. This chapter aimed to discuss multiprofessional performance in sepsis protocols in emergency settings and its implications for mortality reduction and care qualification. This is a narrative literature review based on international guidelines, scientific articles and institutional documents related to sepsis management. It was observed that the integration between nursing, medicine, physiotherapy, clinical pharmacy and other healthcare professionals favors early recognition of organ dysfunction, greater adherence to therapeutic bundles, reduced time to antibiotic administration and strengthening of patient safety. In addition, strategies related to continuing education, interprofessional communication and technological incorporation demonstrated positive impacts on care quality and hospital clinical outcomes. It is concluded that multiprofessional performance is an essential element for the effectiveness of sepsis protocols and for the consolidation of safer, more effective and humanized healthcare practices.
Descargas
Referencias
EVANS, Laura et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Critical Care Medicine, Philadelphia, v. 49, n. 11, p. e1063-e1143, 2021.
KUMAR, Anand et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Critical Care Medicine, Philadelphia, v. 34, n. 6, p. 1589-1596, 2006.
MACHADO, Flávia Ribeiro et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in Brazilian intensive care units. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, London, v. 17, n. 11, p. 1180-1189, 2017.
RHODES, Andrew et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, v. 43, n. 3, p. 304-377, 2017.
SINGER, Mervyn et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, Chicago, v. 315, n. 8, p. 801-810, 2016.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Sepsis. Geneva: WHO, 2023.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
