BREASTFEEDING: PRACTICES, MYTHS AND INCENTIVE POLICIES

Authors

  • Janaina Ferreira de Sousa Autor
  • Evanilda Silva Bispo Autor
  • Alberto Mateus Pinheiro da Gama Autor
  • Aline Maria de Castro Reis Alves Autor
  • Emanuela Almeida Sobral Autor
  • Maria Eridan Lima Barreto Autor
  • Maria de Lourdes Freitas de Sousa Autor
  • Andréa Martins Colares da Silva Autor
  • Ana Carolina Goes da Silva Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.014-049

Keywords:

Breastfeeding, Myths and beliefs, Public policies, Maternal and child health, Promotion of breastfeeding

Abstract

Breastfeeding is widely recognized as the most complete and safe form of infant nutrition, essential for the child’s physical and emotional development and for the mother’s health. This study aimed to analyze breastfeeding practices, identify the main myths that interfere with its adherence, and discuss public policies that promote and support this practice. The methodology consisted of an integrative literature review conducted between June and August 2025, based on scientific articles published in the last ten years in the SciELO, LILACS, and PubMed databases. Studies addressing cultural aspects, popular beliefs, and governmental strategies related to breastfeeding were included. The results showed that although most mothers are aware of the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding until six months of age, there are still significant barriers such as misconceptions about the quality of breast milk, lack of family support, and difficulties upon returning to work. Among the most common myths are the belief in “weak milk” and the supposed need for early food supplementation. Public policies, such as the Amamenta e Alimenta Brasil Strategy and the extension of maternity leave, proved effective in promoting and maintaining breastfeeding. It is concluded that the success of breastfeeding depends on continuous educational actions, the fight against misinformation, and the strengthening of incentive policies, with the active involvement of health professionals, families, and society as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Estratégia Amamenta e Alimenta Brasil: guia para profissionais de saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2021.

CARVALHO, M. R.; TAMEZ, R. N. Amamentação: bases científicas para a prática profissional. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2019.

GONÇALVES, A. L.; OLIVEIRA, C. S. Barreiras socioculturais na manutenção do aleitamento materno exclusivo: revisão integrativa. Revista de Enfermagem Contemporânea, v. 11, n. 2, p. 134–142, 2022.

MELO, L. P.; TORRES, C. A. Políticas públicas e promoção do aleitamento materno no Brasil: avanços e desafios. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, v. 20, n. 4, p. 997–1006, 2020.

MENDES, K. D. S.; SILVEIRA, R. C. C. P.; GALVÃO, C. M. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem, v. 17, n. 4, p. 758–764, 2008.

OLIVEIRA, M. I. C.; SILVA, K. S. Fatores associados à interrupção precoce do aleitamento materno exclusivo em diferentes regiões do Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 36, n. 9, p. e00227219, 2020.

SANTOS, T. C.; BARBOSA, J. L.; COSTA, L. A. Influência de mitos e crenças populares na prática do aleitamento materno. Revista de Enfermagem UFPE On Line, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1–10, 2021.

SOUZA, M. T.; SILVA, M. D.; CARVALHO, R. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein (São Paulo), v. 8, n. 1, p. 102–106, 2010.

VICTORA, C. G. et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet, v. 387, n. 10017, p. 475–490, 2016.

WHITTEMORE, R.; KNAFL, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 52, n. 5, p. 546–553, 2005.

Published

2025-11-11

How to Cite

BREASTFEEDING: PRACTICES, MYTHS AND INCENTIVE POLICIES. (2025). Aurum Editora, 581-588. https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.014-049

Publications by the same author

1 2 > >>