CANCER CACHEXIA AND SARCOPENIA: NUTRITIONAL STRATEGIES TO PRESERVE MUSCLE MASS AND AUTONOMY

Authors

  • Marciele Alves Bolognese Autor
  • Diogo Henrique La Cotes de Almeida Autor
  • Ketllyn Bianca Fernandes Autor
  • Marlon Sgorla de Souza Autor
  • Natan Fernando Lopes de Souza Autor
  • Sophia Pereira Totti Marques Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.034-015

Keywords:

Cancer cachexia, Sarcopenia, Clinical nutrition, Muscle mass, Nutritional oncology

Abstract

Cancer cachexia and sarcopenia are complex, multifactorial, and highly prevalent syndromes in the oncological context, associated with metabolic, inflammatory, and functional alterations that negatively affect prognosis, treatment response, and quality of life in cancer patients. This chapter aimed to critically analyze the available scientific evidence on these conditions, with emphasis on nutritional strategies focused on preserving muscle mass and functional autonomy.

The study is characterized as a narrative literature review, developed from scientific articles, international consensus statements, and clinical guidelines indexed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases. The analysis shows that muscle loss results from complex systemic mechanisms, including chronic inflammation, anabolic resistance, mitochondrial dysfunction, and increased protein catabolism — and cannot be explained solely by decreased food intake.

Findings demonstrate a consistent association between muscle loss, decline in strength and functionality, reduced autonomy, and poorer quality of life, regardless of tumor site. Additionally, early assessment of body composition and functionality proved essential for identifying sarcopenia and cachexia, enabling more timely and individualized nutritional interventions.

It is concluded that appropriate nutritional strategies, when implemented early and integrated into a multidisciplinary care model, play a fundamental role in preserving muscle mass, mitigating functional decline, and promoting a more comprehensive, humanized, and evidence‑based oncological approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARENDS, J. et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition, Oxford, v. 36, n. 1, p. 11–48, 2017.

ARENDS, J. et al. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clinical Nutrition, Oxford, v. 40, n. 6, p. 2898–2913, 2021.

ARGILÉS, J. M. et al. Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis. Nature Reviews Cancer, London, v. 14, n. 11, p. 754–762, 2014.

ARGILÉS, J. M. et al. Cachexia and sarcopenia: mechanisms and potential targets for intervention. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, London, v. 46, p. 18–25, 2019.

BARACOS, V. E. et al. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, London, v. 4, art. 17105, 2018.

CRUZ-JENTOFT, A. J. et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age and Ageing, Oxford, v. 48, n. 1, p. 16–31, 2019.

DALY, L. E. et al. The impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam, v. 162, art. 103347, 2021.

FEARON, K. et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. The Lancet Oncology, London, v. 12, n. 5, p. 489–495, 2011.

FERREIRA, A. C. et al. Association between risk of dysphagia and signs suggestive of sarcopenia, nutritional status and frequency of oral hygiene in hospitalized elderly. CoDAS, São Paulo, v. 36, n. 1, e20230045, 2024.

MUSCARITOLI, M. et al. Cachexia: a new definition. Clinical Nutrition, Oxford, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1–3, 2010.

MUSCARITOLI, M. et al. Nutritional and metabolic support in cancer patients: ESPEN guidelines. Clinical Nutrition, Oxford, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1–2, 2017.

MUSCARITOLI, M. et al. Sarcopenia in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, London, v. 18, n. 9, p. 559–576, 2021.

NISHIDA, T. et al. Sarcopenia and dysphagia: a systematic review. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, Hoboken, v. 12, n. 4, p. 1023–1035, 2021.

PHILLIPS, S. M.; MARTINSON, W. Protein requirements and supplementation in sarcopenia. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, London, v. 22, n. 1, p. 52–57, 2019.

PRADO, C. M. et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. The Lancet Oncology, London, v. 9, n. 7, p. 629–635, 2008.

PRADO, C. M. et al. Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clinical Cancer Research, Philadelphia, v. 15, n. 8, p. 2920–2926, 2009.

PRADO, C. M.; BARACOS, V. E.; MOURTZAKIS, M. Body composition as an independent determinant of cancer outcomes. The Lancet Oncology, London, v. 17, n. 1, p. e62–e75, 2016.

WAKABAYASHI, H. Presbyphagia and sarcopenic dysphagia: association between aging, sarcopenia and deglutition disorders. Journal of Frailty & Aging, Paris, v. 3, n. 2, p. 97–103, 2014.

Published

2026-02-19

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

CANCER CACHEXIA AND SARCOPENIA: NUTRITIONAL STRATEGIES TO PRESERVE MUSCLE MASS AND AUTONOMY. (2026). Aurum Editora, 194-206. https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.034-015

Publications by the same author