CONTEMPORARY VACCINE HESITANCY IN THE FACE OF THE ADVANCE OF VACCINE-PREVENTABLE DISEASES: IMPACTS OF SCIENTIFIC MISINFORMATION, DIGITAL MEDIA, AND THE LOSS OF PUBLIC TRUST ON HERD IMMUNITY AND GLOBAL HEALTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.044-027Keywords:
Herd immunity, Digital media, Scientific misinformation, Vaccine hesitancy, Vaccine-preventable diseasesAbstract
Contemporary vaccine hesitancy has become a major challenge for global public health, particularly in light of the resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases that were previously under control. This study aimed to analyze the impacts of scientific misinformation, the influence of digital media, and the decline in public trust on vaccine adherence and its consequences for herd immunity and global health. The methodology consisted of a narrative literature review based on studies by recognized authors in the fields of immunization, health communication, and social behavior, published in national and international scientific databases. The results demonstrated that the rapid spread of false information through digital environments, combined with anti-vaccine content and limited scientific literacy, significantly contributes to increasing vaccine insecurity. Furthermore, sociocultural, political, and institutional factors influence risk perception and public trust in immunization programs. It is concluded that vaccine hesitancy is a multifactorial phenomenon that compromises vaccination coverage, promotes the reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases, and threatens collective protection. Integrated strategies based on health education, accessible scientific communication, and strengthening social trust are essential for preserving global public health.
Downloads
References
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.
LARSON, Heidi J. et al. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine, Amsterdam, v. 32, n. 19, p. 2150–2159, 2014.
MACDONALD, Noni E. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine, Amsterdam, v. 33, n. 34, p. 4161–4164, 2015.
MARCONI, Marina de Andrade; LAKATOS, Eva Maria. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 9. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2021.
MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 14. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2014.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Ten threats to global health in 2019. Geneva: WHO, 2019.
ZAROCOSTAS, John. How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, London, v. 395, n. 10225, p. 676, 2020.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Report of the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Geneva: WHO, 2014.
DUBÉ, Eve et al. Vaccine hesitancy: an overview. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, New York, v. 9, n. 8, p. 1763–1773, 2013.
PAHO – PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Understanding the infodemic and misinformation in the fight against COVID-19. Washington, D.C.: PAHO, 2020.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Plano Nacional de Operacionalização da Vacinação contra a COVID-19. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2021.
LEVI, Guido Carlos. Recusa de vacinas: causas e consequências. Revista de Saúde Pública, São Paulo, v. 47, n. 2, p. 1–4, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.