COMPARISON OF SURGICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL RISK IN THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY: BARIATRIC SURGERY VERSUS INJECTABLE ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS

Authors

  • Maria Victoria Araújo Rafael Autor
  • Anali Gonzales Calizaya Autor
  • Nathanael Philipe Mendonça e Silva Autor
  • Italo Tammer Oliveira de Castro Autor
  • Mateus Domingues Oliveira Autor
  • Victória Pires Franco Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.036-017

Keywords:

Obesity, Obesity treatment, Bariatric surgery, Injectable antidiabetic drugs, GLP-1 receptor agonists, Tirzepatide

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic disease associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory morbidity and mortality. Among the most effective therapeutic strategies for moderate to severe cases are bariatric surgery and the use of injectable antidiabetic drugs with weight-loss effects, especially GLP-1 agonists such as semaglutide and dual agonists such as tirrizepatide. Bariatric surgery, particularly techniques such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, promotes an average weight loss of 25–35% of total body weight, in addition to significant improvement in glycemic control, with relevant rates of type 2 diabetes remission. There is also consistent evidence of a reduction in cardiovascular events and long-term mortality. However, it is an invasive procedure, with an estimated perioperative risk between 0.1% and 0.5% in specialized centers. Complications include bleeding, thromboembolism, fistulas, infections, and, later on, chronic nutritional deficiencies, dumping syndrome, and the need for lifelong supplementation. The risk is not only immediate: there is a permanent anatomical and metabolic impact. Injectable antidiabetic drugs, on the other hand, act by modulating incretin pathways that increase satiety and delay gastric emptying. Weight loss varies from 10% to 25%, depending on the molecule and dose. The risk profile is predominantly gastrointestinal, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea as the most common adverse events. Rare complications include pancreatitis and cholelithiasis associated with rapid weight loss. Unlike surgery, the immediate risk is lower; however, effectiveness depends on continuous use, and interruption often results in partial or total weight regain. Comparatively, surgery presents a greater magnitude and durability of metabolic response, especially in severe obesity, but with surgical risk and irreversible consequences. Pharmacological therapy offers less invasiveness and greater reversibility, but requires prolonged adherence and may not achieve the same sustained metabolic outcomes. The therapeutic choice should consider the severity of obesity, the presence of comorbidities, the individual risk profile, the capacity for clinical follow-up, and long-term cost-effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. MALAQUINI, L. L. D. et al. Risk-benefit of tirzepatide, semaglutide, and bariatric surgery in obesity. Interamerican Journal of Health Sciences, v. 5, p. 277, 2025. Disponível em: https://ijhsc.uai.edu.ar/index.php/ijhsc/article/view/277. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2026.

2. SOSTER, T. Comparação entre cirurgia bariátrica e tirzepatida (Mounjaro) na redução do risco cardiovascular em pacientes obesos. Lumen et Virtus, 2025. DOI: http://doi.org/10.56238/levv17n56-003. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2026.

3. COURCOULAS, A. P. et al. Impacto da cirurgia bariátrica no controle a longo prazo do diabetes tipo 2 em pacientes com obesidade mórbida. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 2024. (Revisão com foco em desfechos metabólicos cirúrgicos).

4. ZHANG, X. et al. Diabetes remission of bariatric surgery and nonsurgical treatments in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta- analysis. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 2023. Disponível em: https://bmcendocrdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12902- 023-01283-9. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2026.

5. Cardiovascular outcomes and mortality of bariatric surgery versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Elsevier. 2025. (Estudo comparativo de mortalidade e eventos cardiovasculares).

6. A systematic review of the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in surgery. The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 240, 2025. (Revisão sobre implicações cirúrgicas do uso de agonistas de GLP-1).

7. Fatores de risco da cirurgia bariátrica: uma revisão sistemática. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 2024. (Análise de complicações peri e pós-operatórias).

8. IMPACTO da bariátrica na redução de risco cardiovascular: ainda há espaço para esse tratamento? Aracê, 2024. (Revisão comparativa de efeitos cirúrgicos e farmacológicos em risco cardiovascular).

9. GLP-1 drugs versus bariatric surgery for treating obesity. Harvard Health Publishing, 2026. Disponível em: https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying- healthy/glp-1-drugs-versus-bariatric-surgery-for-treating-obesity. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2026.

10. Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery Versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Reducing NASH: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Endocrinology, Diabetes C Metabolism (PubMed), 2025. (Comparação de desfechos clínicos entre cirurgia e terapia medicamentosa).

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF SURGICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL RISK IN THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY: BARIATRIC SURGERY VERSUS INJECTABLE ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS. (2026). Aurum Editora, 138-150. https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.036-017