EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF PRODUCERS FOR ANIMAL GENETIC IMPROVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.075-003Keywords:
Genetic evaluation, Livestock records, SelectionAbstract
Producer education and training are fundamental strategies for broadening the application of animal genetic improvement in production systems. This is a didactic literature review that brings together concepts and practical examples aimed at training producers. Knowledge of the fundamentals of animal breeding makes it possible to understand the principles of selection and the appropriate use of genetic information. In this process, keeping livestock records and ensuring data quality play an essential role, as they provide reliable information for genetic evaluations and for decision-making. Furthermore, training favors the interpretation of genetic evaluation results and their application in the choice of animals, matings and selection strategies. Thus, educational and training actions can bring technical knowledge closer to the reality of producers, contributing to a more efficient use of animal breeding tools within herds.
Downloads
References
BALDIN, M. et al. Standardization for data generation and collection in the dairy industry: addressing challenges and charting a path forward. Animals, v. 15, n. 2, art. 250, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/ani15020250.
BARWICK, S. A. et al. Estimation of accuracies and expected genetic change from selection for selection indexes that use multiple-trait predictions of breeding values. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2013. DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12011.
BASIR, M. S. et al. From pen and paper to digital precision: a comprehensive review of on-farm recordkeeping. Precision Agriculture, v. 25, p. 2643-2682, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11119-024-10172-7.
BERRY, D. P. et al. Genetics of animal health and disease in cattle. Irish Veterinary Journal, v. 64, n. 1, art. 5, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/2046-0481-64-5.
BIJMA, P. The Price equation as a bridge between animal breeding and evolutionary biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 375, n. 1797, art. 20190360, 2020. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0360.
BOURDON, R. M. Understanding animal breeding. 2. ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2000.
BOYLES, S. Expected progeny differences and their accuracy. Ohio BEEF Cattle Letter. Columbus: Ohio State University Extension, 2021. Disponível em: https://u.osu.edu/beef/?p=11555. Acesso em: 15 out. 2026.
BRITO, L. F. et al. Review: Genetic selection of high-yielding dairy cattle toward sustainable farming systems in a rapidly changing world. Animal, v. 15, supl. 1, art. 100292, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100292.
COLE, J. B. Are there too many traits in our selection indices? Journal of Dairy Science, v. 108, n. 11, p. 12483-12505, 2025. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2024-25833.
COLE, J. B.; DÜRR, J. W.; NICOLAZZI, E. L. Invited review: The future of selection decisions and breeding programs: What are we breeding for, and who decides? Journal of Dairy Science, v. 104, n. 5, p. 5111-5124, 2021. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19777.
FATHONI, A. et al. An appropriate genetic approach for improving reproductive traits in crossbred Thai–Holstein cattle under heat stress conditions. Veterinary Sciences, v. 9, n. 4, art. 163, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9040163.
FERNANDES JÚNIOR, G. A. et al. Current applications and perspectives of genomic selection in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle. Livestock Science, v. 263, art. 105001, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105001.
GICHOHI, P. M. The role of record keeping and maintenance in enhancing decision making among smallholder dairy farmers in Gitugi Ward in Murang'a County, Kenya. Information Development, v. 36, n. 4, p. 535-545, 2020.
HAILE, A. et al. How to succeed in implementing community-based breeding programs: lessons from the field in Eastern and Southern Africa. Frontiers in Genetics, v. 14, art. 1119024, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1119024.
HATEW, B. et al. Synergies of feed, management trainings, and genetics on milk production of dairy cows in the tropics: the case of Ethiopian smallholder farmers. Frontiers in Animal Science, v. 4, art. 1119786, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fanim.2023.1119786.
HUSIEN, H. M. et al. The evolution and role of molecular tools in measuring diversity and genomic selection in livestock populations (traditional and up-to-date insights): a comprehensive exploration. Veterinary Sciences, v. 11, n. 12, art. 627, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11120627.
JOURDAN-PINEAU, H. et al. Estimating heritability in honeybees: comparison of three major methods based on empirical and simulated datasets. Ecology and Evolution, v. 11, n. 13, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7389.
LEE, J.; JUNG, J. H.; OH, S.-H. Enhancing animal breeding through quality control in genomic data – a review. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1099-1108, 2024. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2024.e92.
MARTÍN, N. et al. Estimated breeding values of beef sires can predict performance of beef-cross-dairy progeny. Frontiers in Genetics, v. 12, art. 712715, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.712715.
MARTIN-COLLADO, D. et al. Measuring farmers' attitude towards breeding tools: the Livestock Breeding Attitude Scale. Animal, v. 15, n. 2, art. 100062, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100062.
MENCHON, P. et al. Exploration of extension research to promote genetic improvement in cattle production: systematic review. Animals, v. 14, n. 2, art. 231, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/ani14020231.
MÉSZÁROS, G. et al. Framework for assessing genetic variation in livestock using demographic, pedigree, and genomic measures. Frontiers in Genetics, v. 17, art. 1792347, 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2026.1792347.
MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.; LEGARRA, A. Current status of genomic evaluation. Journal of Animal Science, v. 98, n. 4, p. 1-14, 2020. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa101.
MWANGA, G. et al. How information communication technology can enhance evidence-based decisions and farm-to-fork animal traceability for livestock farmers. The Scientific World Journal, v. 2020, art. 1279569, 2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1279569.
PÉRTILE, S. F. N. et al. Seleção e associação genômica ampla para o melhoramento genético animal com uso do método ssGBLUP. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 51, n. 10, p. 1729-1736, out. 2016. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2016001000004.
PIMENTEL, E. C. G. et al. How pedigree errors affect genetic evaluations and validation statistics. Journal of Dairy Science, v. 107, n. 6, p. 3716-3723, 2024. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2023-24070.
RESTI, Y. et al. A review of on-farm recording tools for smallholder dairy farming in developing countries. Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 56, n. 5, art. 168, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-04024-9.
ROMERO-ZÚÑIGA, J. J. et al. Productive and reproductive record keeping in low-to-middle-income tropical livestock systems: challenges and perspectives. Animals, v. 16, n. 11, art. 1691, 2026. DOI: 10.3390/ani16111691.
SCHULTZ, B.; SERÃO, N. V. L.; ROSS, J. W. Genetic improvement of livestock, from conventional breeding to biotechnological approaches. In: BAZER, F. W.; LAMB, G. C.; WU, G. (ed.). Animal agriculture: sustainability, challenges and innovations. [S. l.]: Academic Press, 2020. p. 393-405. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00023-9.
SCHULZ, P. et al. Exploring the role of smartphone apps for livestock farmers: data management, extension and informed decision making. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, v. 28, n. 1, p. 93-114, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2021.1910524.
TADE, B.; MELESSE, A. A review on the application of genomic selection in the improvement of dairy cattle productivity. Ecological Genetics and Genomics, v. 31, art. 100257, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.egg.2024.100257.
TOGHIANI, S. Quantitative genetic application in the selection process for livestock production. In: JAVED, K. (ed.). Livestock production. Rijeka: InTech, 2012. p. 3-32. DOI: 10.5772/51027.
ULE, A.; ERJAVEC, K.; KLOPČIČ, M. Influence of dairy farmers' knowledge on their attitudes towards breeding tools and genomic selection. Animal, v. 17, n. 6, art. 100852, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100852.
ULLAH, K.; WAHEED, A. Review: genetic improvement in livestock: a journey from conventional breeding to genomic precision. Veterinary Biomedical and Clinical Journal, v. 7, n. 1, p. 30-44, 2025. DOI: 10.21776/ub.VetBioClinJ.2025.007.01.3.
VAN EENENNAAM, A. L. Current and future uses of genetic improvement technologies in livestock breeding programs. Animal Frontiers, v. 15, n. 1, p. 80-90, 2025. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfae042.
VAN TASSELL, C. P. et al. The African Goat Improvement Network: a scientific group empowering smallholder farmers. Frontiers in Genetics, v. 14, art. 1183240, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1183240.
WANGEN, S. R. et al. Improving farm decisions: the application of data engineering techniques to manage data streams from contemporary dairy operations. Livestock Science, v. 250, art. 104602, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104602.
WELLMANN, R. Selection index theory for populations under directional and stabilizing selection. Genetics Selection Evolution, v. 55, n. 1, art. 10, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00776-4.
WU, X.-L. et al. Handling errors in the response: considerations for leveraging unsupervised or incomplete data for genetic evaluations. JDS Communications, v. 6, n. 5, p. 675-680, 2025. DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0668.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
