LITERATURE REVIEW ON GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PHYSICS AND SCIENCE: CHALLENGES, POTENTIAL, AND IMPACTS ON THE LEARNING PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.057-011Keywords:
Active Learning, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Physics Education, Science Education, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has become established as an emerging technology in education, particularly in physics and science education since 2022, prompting debate about its pedagogical potential and limitations. The relevance of this topic stems from the sensitive and complex nature of incorporating GenAI into fields that require conceptual rigor, critical thinking, and strong teacher mediation. The general objective of this study is to analyze how the academic literature addresses the use of GenAI in the physics and science teaching and learning process between 2022 and 2025, considering its impacts, challenges, and possibilities. Methodologically, a Systematic Literature Review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. A search of the Scopus database resulted in the analysis of seven studies. The findings indicate that GenAI has the potential to support active learning, problem-solving, and methodological innovation, although it continues to face conceptual limitations, risks of superficial use, and technological dependence. The study concludes that the integration of GenAI requires critical pedagogical strategies, appropriate teacher training, and ethical use in order to enhance learning without compromising the quality of education.
Downloads
References
DUNLAP, Justin; SISSONS, Ryan; WIDENHORN, Ralf. Descending an inclined plane with a large language model. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2025.
GOLOVKO, N. Yu.; GONCHARENKO, T. L.; KOROBOVA, I. V. Experience in developing and implementing a system of visualized teaching cases in physics using a computerized digital measurement system Einstein. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2022.
KORTEMEYER, Gerda; NÖHL, Julian; ONISHCHUK, Daria. Assisting grading of handwritten thermodynamics exams using artificial intelligence: an exploratory study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2024.
MOREIRA, Marco Antônio. Ensino de Física no Brasil: desafios e perspectivas. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2018.
PAGE, Matthew J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, v. 372, 2021.
POLVERINI, Giulia; GREGORCIC, Bor. How understanding large language models can inform the use of ChatGPT in physics education. European Journal of Physics, 2024.
POLVERINI, Giulia et al. Performance of ChatGPT on physics tasks involving visual representations: the case of the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2025.
PRATES, José Humberto de Souza et al. Ensino de física mediado por aprendizado de máquina: o caso do pêndulo simples. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 2023.
TONG, Dazhen et al. Exploring the role of human-AI collaboration in scientific problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2025.
VILELAS, José. Investigação: o processo de construção do conhecimento. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo, 2022.
WANG, Peijun; JING, Yuhui; SHEN, Shusheng. A systematic literature review on the application of generative artificial intelligence in higher education: instructional contexts, processes and strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.