ACTIVE LEARNING METHODOLOGIES AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES: STUDENT PROTAGONISM AND PEDAGOGICAL MEDIATION

Authors

  • Fabíola Franco Torres da Silva Autor
  • Augusto Guilherme Teixeira Frutuozo Autor
  • Romylson Leal dos Santos Autor
  • Gabriella Paiva dos Santos Autor
  • Mariza Vasconcelos da Silva Autor
  • Leandro Soares Machado Autor
  • Andreia Vanessa de Oliveira Autor
  • Eledy de Souza Autor
  • Tiago Augusto de Figueiredo Autor
  • Leticia Pereira dos Santos Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.035-005

Keywords:

Active learning methodologies, Digital technologies, Student protagonism, Pedagogical mediation, Human formation

Abstract

The expansion of active learning methodologies articulated with digital technologies has occupied a central place in contemporary educational discourse, often associated with pedagogical innovation, student protagonism, and the overcoming of traditional teaching practices. However, the adoption of these methodologies requires critical analysis, especially when implemented in an instrumental or unreflective manner, detached from consistent pedagogical and ethical foundations. This chapter aims to discuss the relationship between active methodologies and digital technologies, problematizing the meanings attributed to student protagonism and pedagogical mediation in the context of contemporary schooling. Grounded in critical pedagogy, philosophy of education, and studies on educational technologies, the chapter examines how active methodologies may either foster emancipatory formative processes or reinforce logics of individual accountability, performativity, and the weakening of the teacher’s role. Drawing on authors such as Freire, Dewey, Biesta, Nóvoa, Moran, and Selwyn, it argues that active methodologies become inclusive and formative pedagogical practices only when articulated with pedagogical intentionality, dialogue, and commitment to human formation. The chapter concludes that the pedagogical potential of active methodologies lies less in technique and more in their integration into critical, dialogical, and socially committed educational projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIESTA, Gert. The beautiful risk of education. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2013.

BIESTA, Gert. Good education in an age of measurement: ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2015.

DEWEY, John. Democracia e educação. São Paulo: Nacional, 1979.

FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.

MORAN, José Manuel. A educação que desejamos: novos desafios e como chegar lá. Campinas: Papirus, 2015.

NÓVOA, António. Professores: imagens do futuro presente. Lisboa: Educa, 2009.

SELWYN, Neil. Education and technology: key issues and debates. 2. ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.

TARDIF, Maurice. Saberes docentes e formação profissional. 17. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2014.

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

ACTIVE LEARNING METHODOLOGIES AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES: STUDENT PROTAGONISM AND PEDAGOGICAL MEDIATION. (2026). Aurum Editora, 46-57. https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.035-005