PATIENT-VENTILATOR ASYNCHRONIES: TYPES, RESULTS, AND DETECTION SKILLS OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM

Authors

  • Elizamara da Silva Assunção Autor
  • Thais Melo Gonçalves Autor
  • Camila de Lima Oliveira Autor
  • Mayra Vanessa da Costa Guimarães Autor
  • Hanna Mikaely Cavalcante de Sousa Autor
  • Hellem Thais do Rosário Pereira Autor
  • Laís Majoriê de Azevedo Corrêa Autor
  • Catharina das Graças de Almeida Martins Autor
  • Thayná Mariana Viana da Silva Autor
  • Matheus Filho Cardoso Souza Autor
  • Luana Magnólia Valente Scantbelruy Autor
  • Andreza Evaldt de Lima Autor
  • Marília Barbosa Carréra dos Reis Autor
  • Giulia Bispo de Souza Autor
  • Letícia Pedrita Sampaio dos Santos Autor
  • Elaine Glauce Santos de Souza Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.014-024

Keywords:

Artificial respiration, Respiratory failure, Interactive ventilatory support

Abstract

Introduction: Patient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a common complication in mechanically ventilated patients, characterized by a mismatch between the patient’s respiratory effort and the support provided by the ventilator. This phenomenon can manifest as ineffective triggering, premature or delayed cycling, and other asynchronies, and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer ICU stay, and increased mortality. Objectives: To identify the types of PVA, analyze their clinical impacts, and evaluate the detection skills of the multidisciplinary team in intensive care units. Methods: A literature review was conducted between March and October 2025, with searches in the BVS and PubMed databases using DeCS and MeSH descriptors. Articles published between 2020 and 2025, available in open access and with methodologically compatible designs, were included. The process followed the PRISMA flowchart, resulting in a final selection of eight studies. Results: The studies indicated that advanced ventilatory modes, such as NAVA, PSN, and monitoring via Pmus, improve patient–ventilator synchrony, reduce discomfort, and decrease associated complications. Adjustments of sensitivity, flow, and PEEP, as well as structured protocols, were effective in reducing asynchronies. Conclusion: PVA is a multifactorial challenge that requires early detection, individualized management, and continuous training of the multidisciplinary team to optimize clinical outcomes and patient safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMIB/SBPT. Orientações Práticas em Ventilação Mecânica. Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira e Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia, 2024.

BARBAS, C. S. V. et al. Recomendações brasileiras de ventilação mecânica. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, v. 25, n. 3, p. 212–239, 2013.

COPPADORO, Andrea et al. The use of head helmets to deliver noninvasive ventilatory support: a comprehensive review of technical aspects and clinical findings. Critical Care, v. 25, n. 1, 8 set. 2021.

HOLANDA, Marcelo Alcantara et al. Patient-ventilator asynchrony. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 44, n. 4, p. 321-333, 6 jul. 2018.

LANGER, Thomas et al. Severe diaphragmatic dysfunction with preserved activity of accessory respiratory muscles in a critically ill child: a case report of failure of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and successful support with pressure support ventilation (PSV). BMC Pediatrics, v. 19, n. 1, 17 maio 2019.

LONGHINI, Federico et al. New setting of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist for noninvasive ventilation by facial mask: a physiologic study. Critical Care, v. 21, n. 1, 7 jul. 2017.

MARTOS-BENÍTEZ, Frank Daniel et al. Outcomes of ventilatory asynchrony in patients with inspiratory effort. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, v. 32, n. 2, 2020.

MARTOS-BENÍTEZ, Frank Daniel et al. Outcomes of ventilatory asynchrony in patients with inspiratory effort. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, v. 32, n. 2, 2020.

NILIUS, Georg et al. Non-invasive ventilation with intelligent volume-assured pressure support versus pressure-controlled ventilation: effects on the respiratory event rate and sleep quality in COPD with chronic hypercapnia. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Volume 12, p. 1039-1045, mar. 2017.

PAGE, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, v. 372, n. 71, 2021.

SILVA, Daniel Oliveira et al. Impact on the ability of healthcare professionals to correctly identify patient-ventilator asynchronies of the simultaneous visualization of estimated muscle pressure curves on the ventilator display: a randomized study (Pmus study). Critical Care, v. 27, n. 1, 30 mar. 2023.

VILLAR, Jesús et al. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, v. 17, n. 1, 13 out. 2016.

Published

2025-10-06

How to Cite

PATIENT-VENTILATOR ASYNCHRONIES: TYPES, RESULTS, AND DETECTION SKILLS OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM. (2025). Aurum Editora, 293-305. https://doi.org/10.63330/aurumpub.014-024